The Heroes who Enabled Advance Warning of Sandy

It came all at once, without warning. . . .

It was unexpected and unannounced, sudden and surly, inundating, devastating, mutilating, obliterating. It battered and bludgeoned the shore until there was no more shore, until it was all running water and milling debris, until almost every trace of a human presence had been washed away.

Hurricane Sandy? Nope. That was the Great Atlantic Storm that struck the East Coast of the United States, its main fury focused on New Jersey, on March 6, 1962. The quote above is from the 1993 book Great Storms of the Jersey Shore in its documentation of what NJ weather experts at the time termed “the worst storm recorded since Colonial times.”

Fifty years ago, storms were much harder to predict—hurricanes in particular. Weathermen could do little more than observe their zigs and zags, and warn coastal residents based on a hurricane’s direction-of-the-moment. Much less was known about how upper atmospheric conditions and other factors affected the strength and paths of these storms.

Fast-forward to October 2012. From the moment Sandy formed in the Caribbean Sea, forecasters predicted that the storm could make an extremely freakish sharp westward turn toward the northeastern United States, rather than continue on the usual northeastward track toward the open waters of the North Atlantic. Equally impressive was the crucial forecast that Sandy would transform into a super-powerful “nor’easter” and strengthen as it approached the coast, rather than weaken as hurricanes typically do in the northern latitudes. (A nor’easter is a type of storm, common to the northeastern United States, that feeds off of the contrast between the Atlantic’s warm gulf stream and cold Canadian air masses over land, and that is enhanced by a dip in the northern jet stream combined with a high-pressure system in southeastern Canada.)

The morning that the Great Atlantic Storm struck, a mad scramble to evacuate the coast coincided with howling winds, rising seas, and heavy snows—all utterly unexpected the day before. Fortunately, the Jersey Shore was much less populated in 1962. It was mainly seasonal bungalows, boardwalks, and a fraction of the development that is there today. And since the storm struck in winter, there were relatively fewer people to evacuate.

But in the last 50 years, the Jersey Shore population has grown tremendously.

Had meteorologists been stuck with 1962 technology when Sandy struck, the scenario in 2012 would have been much different. On Sunday evening, October 28, Hurricane Sandy, moving northeastward off of the North Carolina coast, would have seemed to be heading harmlessly out to sea. East Coast residents would have gone to bed oblivious to the gathering threat, as did coastal residents in 1962. And, similar to 1962, they would have awoken Monday morning, October 29, to panicky reports that Sandy had unexpectedly turned west toward Atlantic City. Mere hours, rather than days, would have remained to facilitate mass evacuations.

While weather prediction may never be an exact science, and future forecasts may not always be this accurate, one has to be impressed by the scientists and engineers who made possible the accurate tracking of this storm. There were many heroic stories during and in the aftermath of Sandy. But perhaps the greatest heroes are the men and women who developed the weather predictive technologies—from satellites to powerful supercomputers—that enabled the meteorologists to head off what could have been a much greater loss of life in New Jersey, New York, and southern New England.

Like this post? Join our mailing list to receive our weekly digest. And for in-depth commentary from an Objectivist perspective, subscribe to our quarterly journal, The Objective Standard.

Related:

Image: Wikimedia Commons


Comments submitted to TOS Blog are moderated. To be considered for posting, a comment must be civil, substantive, and fewer than 400 words in length. If approved, your comment will be posted soon.

  • Laura Owens

    Have you seen a new documentary series on the History Channel called The Men Who Built America? It actually glorifies capitalists & inventors, explaining what they do & the importance of it, calling them captains of industry instead of robber barons. The episode I watched was about J.P. Morgan funding Edison (a risky investment at the time), & how that ended up bringing electricity to most of New England. It wasn’t dry or boring, either, but was presented as an engaging, even suspenseful, story. We need to encourage TV execs to air more positive, pro-capitalism shows like this. Could someone at TOS write a
    review of this series, and help advertize it?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-A-LaFerrara/100001601178840 Michael A LaFerrara

      Laura: Thanks for highlighting this series. I hadn’t seen it. Just mentioning it here will get it some exposure.

  • Laura Owens

    Have you seen a new documentary series on the History Channel called The Men Who Built America? It actually glorifies capitalists & inventors, explaining what they do & the importance of it, calling them captains of industry instead of robber barons. The episode I watched was about J.P. Morgan funding Edison (a risky investment at the time), & how that ended up bringing electricity to most of New England. It wasn’t dry or boring, either, but was presented as an engaging, even suspenseful, story. We need to encourage TV execs to air more positive, pro-capitalism shows like this. Could someone at TOS write a
    review of this series, and help advertize it?

    • http://principledperspectives.blogspot.com/ Michael LaFerrara

      Laura: Thanks for highlighting this series. I hadn’t seen it. Just mentioning it here will get it some exposure.