Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Reconsidering Greg Smith’s Goldman Sachs Op-Ed
In a recent blog post, I lauded Greg Smith’s op-ed chastising Goldman Sachs for losing its focus on the long-range goal of making money with its clients and shifting its focus to a shortsighted approach of making money off its clients. I also said that I thought the media had mischaracterized Smith’s comments as a condemnation of capitalism, specifically of Wall Street greed, and I still think this is the case.
However, it has been brought to my attention—both by Craig Biddle, who had not read the Smith op-ed prior to green lighting my post for TOS Blog, and by a lucid article from Eric Dennis at the Center for Industrial Progress—that the evidence Smith offers for his claims against Goldman is flimsy at best. Smith makes general claims to the effect that Goldman has abandoned its long-range, client-centered approach, but he provides no concrete examples, only say-so.
In my initial assessment, I gave Smith the benefit of the doubt because I thought his op-ed appeared supportive of business (and finance) in general while being critical of Goldman’s failure—as Smith saw it—to uphold its pledge to recommend investments “most directly aligned with the client’s goals.” In re-reading the op-ed, I now see that Smith’s comments could reasonably be interpreted differently, and I question whether he deserves the benefit of the doubt.
Whatever the facts of the matter in this case are, however, my main point remains true. For a business to be self-interested—that is, to make the most money in the long-term—it must provide its customers with exactly what it promises to provide. If a bank tells clients that it seeks to help them secure investments that make the most sense for them given their needs and goals, then it is in the bank’s best interest to do so. If the bank fails to uphold its promise in order to make short-term gains, the breach of integrity will spread, throttle the bank’s reputation, and lead to long-term losses—none of which is in the bank’s self-interest.
Whatever Smith’s intentions, this is what I took him to be saying. Far from condemning greed or the profit motive, such a message promotes long-term self-interest and wealth creation as the proper goals of any business enterprise.
And that is a message corporate America desperately needs to hear.
If you enjoyed this post, consider subscribing to The Objective Standard and making objective journalism a regular part of your life.
Image: Creative Commons by Quantumquark
Posted in: Business and Economics
- Next Post: Philippines: Destroy the Moro Islamic Liberation Front
- Previous Post: Amazon’s Robots: “Raising the Productivity of Your Time”
Join Our Mailing List
If you enjoy TOS Blog please make a donation to keep us blogging
- Announcements (163)
- Events (36)
- Ayn Rand and Objectivism (82)
- Business and Economics (75)
- Culture (61)
- Education and Pedagogy (23)
- Environmentalism (52)
- Foreign Policy and War (155)
- History (58)
- Individual Rights and Law (577)
- Abortion and Reproduction (20)
- Antitrust (15)
- Banking and Monetary Policy (7)
- Criminal Justice (5)
- Education Policy (49)
- Free Speech (31)
- Gay Issues (5)
- Guns and Self Defense (10)
- Health Care (88)
- Immigration (4)
- Libertarianism (7)
- Property Rights (15)
- Regulations (42)
- Taxation (29)
- The Left (6)
- Unions (5)
- Welfare and Subsidies (17)
- Philosophy (95)
- Ethics (32)
- Politicians and Candidates (72)
- Productivity (15)
- Psychology (5)
- Reason at Large (11)
- Religion (119)
- Romance (2)
- Science and Technology (113)
- Uncategorized (1)
Ideas presented in posts on TOS Blog are those of the authors of the posts and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Objective Standard. TOS Blog is powered by WordPress.