Friday, March 30, 2012
Why does E.J. Dionne Pretend the United States is a Democracy?
Commenting on the Supreme Court session regarding Obamacare, Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne, Jr. wrote:
And in arguing for restraint, Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked what was wrong with leaving as much discretion as possible “in the hands of the people who should be fixing this, not us.” It was nice to be reminded that we’re a democracy, not a judicial dictatorship.
Does Dionne really believe that the United States is a democracy?
Although certain political offices and local initiatives are decided by democratic vote (i.e., majority), America is emphatically not a democracy (a country in which everything is decided by majority vote). America is, by design, a constitutionally limited republic that is supposed to protect individual rights regardless of majority vote.
Under the American system, the Supreme Court does not act as a “judicial dictator”; rather, it acts as the protector of the constitutionally recognized rights of the individual (the smallest minority) from infringements by the legislature (representatives elected by the majority).
The founders of America were explicitly against democracy as a form of government. As James Madison wrote in the Federalist #10:
A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.
Educated liberals such as E.J. Dionne can’t conceivably be ignorant of the fact that the Founders established America as a constitutional republic and not a democracy. Why do they pretend otherwise?
(Dan Mitchell makes additional points about Dionne’s bizarre piece here.)
If you enjoyed this post, consider subscribing to The Objective Standard and making objective journalism a regular part of your life.
Image: Wikipedia Commons
- Next Post: Memo to Justice Kagan: Taxes Are Coercive
- Previous Post: Proposed Ban on Words Assaults Reason and Life
Join Our Mailing List
If you enjoy TOS Blog please make a donation to keep us blogging
- Announcements (170)
- Events (36)
- Ayn Rand and Objectivism (84)
- Business and Economics (79)
- Culture (69)
- Education and Pedagogy (23)
- Environmentalism (52)
- Foreign Policy and War (156)
- History (61)
- Individual Rights and Law (597)
- Abortion and Reproduction (20)
- Antitrust (15)
- Banking and Monetary Policy (7)
- Criminal Justice (5)
- Education Policy (50)
- Free Speech (32)
- Gay Issues (5)
- Guns and Self Defense (10)
- Health Care (91)
- Immigration (5)
- Libertarianism (7)
- Property Rights (15)
- Regulations (47)
- Taxation (32)
- The Left (7)
- Unions (5)
- Welfare and Subsidies (19)
- Philosophy (99)
- Ethics (35)
- Politicians and Candidates (73)
- Productivity (16)
- Psychology (5)
- Reason at Large (11)
- Religion (121)
- Romance (2)
- Science and Technology (119)
- Uncategorized (1)
Ideas presented in posts on TOS Blog are those of the authors of the posts and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Objective Standard. TOS Blog is powered by WordPress.