Bernanke Defends Fed Policy that Turned Dollar Into Four Cents

Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke is “one of the most powerful men in Washington,” notes the New York Times. Of course he is: He holds near-dictatorial powers over the nation’s money supply.

In a recent talk at George Washington University, Bernanke condemned the gold standard for hampering the government’s ability to spend money. The New York Times reports: “Tying the supply of money to the supply of a precious metal limits a government’s ability to address economic problems, Mr. Bernanke explained.”

But limiting the government’s power to meddle in the economy is one of the great virtues of a commodity-backed currency.

Economist George Selgin offers a detailed rebuttal of Bernanke’s lecture. Selgin addresses Bernanke’s historical claims in detail and summarizes Bernanke’s central evasion:

That central banks’ own policies might actually cause inflation, or contribute to the business cycle, or trigger crises, or blow-up asset bubbles—these are possibilities to which every economist worth his or her salt attaches some importance, if not overwhelming importance. But they are also possibilities that every true-blue central banker avoids like so many landmines.

But perhaps the most vivid demonstration of the destructive nature of the Fed is the falling value of the dollar. According to “The Inflation Calculator,” a 2010 dollar had the same purchasing power as did four cents in 1910. The Fed’s printing of fiat money, which Bernanke desperately defends, has sunk the value of the dollar and promises more inflation in coming years.

Insofar as the Fed continues to exist, it should be required by law to return to and remain on a gold standard. Ultimately, though, as Yaron Brook of the Ayn Rand Institute points out, central banking and its fiat currency should be ended and replaced with free market banking and money.

If you enjoyed this post, consider subscribing to The Objective Standard and making objective journalism a regular part of your life.


Image: Wikimedia Commons

, , ,

Comments submitted to TOS are moderated and checked periodically. Anonymous posts are not permitted; commenters must use their real names. To be considered for posting, a comment must be civil, substantive, on topic, and no longer than 400 words. Ad hominem attacks, arguments from intimidation, misrepresentations, off-topic comments, and comments that ignore relevant points made in the article will be deleted. Thank you for helping us to keep the discussion intellectually profitable.