Top Menu Left

Top Menu Right

Subscriber-only Content

This audio content is accessible only to current Audio or Premium subscribers. For access, login, subscribe or upgrade your subscription.

Get Access...

Subscriber-only Content

This ebook content is accessible only to current Ebook or Premium subscribers. For access, login, subscribe or upgrade your subscription.

Get Access...

Elizabeth Price Foley: The Implication of the Individual Mandate is Unlimited

In a brief video, constitutional law professor Elizabeth Price Foley discusses the Institute for Justice’s amicus brief, which she co-authored, on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) for the U.S. Supreme Court. Here’s an excerpt:

It’s always been the case under Anglo-American law that contracts have to be willing, they have to be based on the voluntary, mutual assent of the parties. So you cannot coerce a contract, and there are many doctrines that support this idea from fraud, to incapacity, to duress. . .

In theory, if this individual mandate is upheld the government can impose any other kind of contractual relationship against your will. So for example, they could force you to enter into a contract of employment for the rest of your life, they could force you to join a union, they could force you to enter into a contract with a landlord, or a mortgage company. Literally the implications are unlimited.

Well worth a watch.

Also check out ObamaCare v. the Constitution by Paul J. Beard II.

Related:


Comments submitted to TOS Blog are moderated and checked periodically. To be considered for posting, a comment must be civil, substantive, on topic, and no longer than 400 words. Ad hominem attacks, arguments from intimidation, misrepresentations, off-topic comments, and comments that ignore points made in the article will be deleted. Thank you for helping us to keep the discussion intellectually profitable.