Elizabeth Price Foley: The Implication of the Individual Mandate is Unlimited

In a brief video, constitutional law professor Elizabeth Price Foley discusses the Institute for Justice’s amicus brief, which she co-authored, on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) for the U.S. Supreme Court. Here’s an excerpt:

It’s always been the case under Anglo-American law that contracts have to be willing, they have to be based on the voluntary, mutual assent of the parties. So you cannot coerce a contract, and there are many doctrines that support this idea from fraud, to incapacity, to duress. . .

In theory, if this individual mandate is upheld the government can impose any other kind of contractual relationship against your will. So for example, they could force you to enter into a contract of employment for the rest of your life, they could force you to join a union, they could force you to enter into a contract with a landlord, or a mortgage company. Literally the implications are unlimited.

Well worth a watch.

Also check out ObamaCare v. the Constitution by Paul J. Beard II.


Return to Top

Comments submitted to TOS are moderated and checked periodically. Commenters must use their real names, and comments may not exceed 400 words. For a comment to be approved, it must be civil, substantive, and on topic. Ad hominem attacks, arguments from intimidation, misrepresentations, unsubstantiated accusations, baseless assertions, and comments that ignore relevant points made in the article are not permitted. Comments that violate these rules will not be approved. Thank you for helping us to keep the discussion intellectually profitable.

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply