Shale Gas Is Plentiful; Freedom to Produce It Is Not

On Monday, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported that the technically recoverable shale gas resources throughout the world increased 10 percent from the 2011 estimate. This rise is a consequence of increased geological knowledge combined with the wondrous technologies of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing.

Of the forty-one countries within the EIA study, China had the largest shale gas reserves, followed by Argentina, Algeria, the United States, and Canada.

Interestingly, given all this potential, shale gas is produced commercially only within the borders of Canada and the United States. Not coincidentally, these are also the only two countries that to some extent protect rights to private mineral ownership.

When compared to the rest of the world, North Americans have enjoyed a history of relative protections of the right to develop, trade, and dispose of their mineral properties as they see fit. This has created the incentive and the legal stability for the growth of a domestic gas industry with world-class technical expertise, well-developed infrastructure, and readily available high-tech equipment. All of this is necessary for shale gas production—and all of this is sorely lacking outside of North America.

The potential to develop shale exists throughout the world, but the political environment necessary to turn that potential into productive reality does not. In North America, producers have been able to turn potential energy into such an abundance of actual energy that last year shale gas accounted for 40 percent of total U.S. gas production.

Might there be a lesson here?

Like this post? Join our mailing list to receive our weekly digest. And for in-depth commentary from an Objectivist perspective, subscribe to our quarterly journal, The Objective Standard.


Image: Wikimedia Commons

Return to Top

Comments submitted to TOS are moderated and checked periodically. Commenters must use their real names, and comments may not exceed 400 words. For a comment to be approved, it must be civil, substantive, and on topic. Ad hominem attacks, arguments from intimidation, misrepresentations, unsubstantiated accusations, baseless assertions, and comments that ignore relevant points made in the article are not permitted. Comments that violate these rules will not be approved. Thank you for helping us to keep the discussion intellectually profitable.

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply