Top Menu Left

Top Menu Right

Subscriber-only Content

This audio content is accessible only to current Audio or Premium subscribers. For access, login, subscribe or upgrade your subscription.

Get Access...

Subscriber-only Content

This ebook content is accessible only to current Ebook or Premium subscribers. For access, login, subscribe or upgrade your subscription.

Get Access...

Rolling Stone Smears Defenders of Fossil Fuels

Perhaps we should expect no better from the magazine that published a sycophantic tribute to the Boston bombers. Still, it is disappointing to see Rolling Stone smear Alex Epstein, a contributor to The Objective Standard, president of the Center for Industrial Progress, and outspoken defender of the use of fossil fuels.

Calling Epstein one of “Global Warming’s Denier Elite,” Rolling Stone falsely claims that Epstein denies that warming has occurred. In an article for Forbes, Epstein sets the record straight:

I am an outspoken global warming affirmer. I recognize that in the last 150 years the average temperature around the globe has trended upward rather than downward. I recognize that human CO2 emissions make a contribution to warming through the mechanism of the “greenhouse effect.”

At least Rolling Stone’s blurb about Epstein correctly indicates that he defends the use of fossil fuels. That one’s position on global warming does not logically imply one’s position on the beneficence of fossil fuels is apparently lost on Rolling Stone’s contributors and editors.

Epstein moves the discussion in a useful direction:

The real point of contention is not whether there is some global warming and whether human beings have some climate impact, but a) whether warming is a problem and b) whether fossil fuel energy should be restricted. My answers are a) “No” and b) “No!”

As Epstein points out, practically no one denies that global warming has taken place in the last century—just as it has taken place many times throughout Earth’s history. Unfortunately, many people—apparently including those involved with this smear piece at Rolling Stone—wrongly ignore or deny the fact that the use of fossil fuels has dramatically improved human life.

Early industrialists burned coal to power ships, trains, and factories. To this day, industrialists burn coal to produce much of the electricity people need to power their appliances, cool and heat their homes, run their electronics, and so on. We burn petroleum to ship goods and services and move ourselves from place to place. A huge percentage of the goods we produce and use are made of petroleum. Thanks to the revolution in hydraulic fracturing, we increasingly use natural gas to generate electricity, run our furnaces, and so on.

Rolling Stone mocks Epstein for telling oil producers, “Thank you for producing the lifeblood of civilization.” But producing the lifeblood of civilization is precisely what the producers of oil and other fossil fuels do—and should be thanked for.

Kudos to Epstein, and shame on Rolling Stone.

Like this post? Join our mailing list to receive our weekly digest. And for in-depth commentary from an Objectivist perspective, subscribe to our quarterly journal, The Objective Standard.



Comments submitted to TOS Blog are moderated and checked periodically. To be considered for posting, a comment must be civil, substantive, on topic, and no longer than 400 words. Ad hominem attacks, arguments from intimidation, misrepresentations, off-topic comments, and comments that ignore points made in the article will be deleted. Thank you for helping us to keep the discussion intellectually profitable.