Dear Mr. Krugman,
In “Galt, Gold and God,” you assert of Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged that “the book is a perennial favorite among adolescent boys. Most boys eventually outgrow it. Some, however, remain devotees for life. And [Paul] Ryan is one of those devotees. . . . Mr. Ryan is considered the modern G.O.P.’s big thinker. What does it say about the party when its intellectual leader evidently gets his ideas largely from deeply unrealistic fantasy novels?”
Because your friends and colleagues might hesitate to do so, I should inform you that the argument from intimidation—the attempt to substitute psychological pressure for rational argument—is, as Ayn Rand explained, “a confession of intellectual impotence.” Thank you, however, for the forthright disclosure.
As for your claim that Ben Bernanke’s expansion of the fiat money supply has not caused inflation: That is ridiculous on its face (although not surprising given the above confession).
The expansion of fiat money is inflation. The two are the same thing. How, where, and when inflation manifests in market prices—including commodity prices and long-term interest rates—is a complex issue. But the printing of money unmoored to any actual value in the marketplace, or the extension of credit unsupported by so much as the reputation of a private bank, is the devaluation of real money and real credit. Ask any nine-year-old about the value of a dollar bill when the marketplace is flooded with them as compared to the value of a dollar bill when there are relatively few in circulation, and he will further clarify this for you.
In closing, I want emphatically to thank you for pointing people to Atlas Shrugged and especially to John Galt’s and Francisco d’Anconia’s vital and moving speeches. When Americans read and understand these, they will join wholeheartedly in the fight for individual rights, freedom, and a return to the gold standard.
Sometimes it’s as if you’re batting for the capitalists. We appreciate that.
Sincerely,
Craig Biddle
Like this post? Join our mailing list to receive our weekly digest. And for in-depth commentary from an Objectivist perspective, subscribe to our quarterly journal, The Objective Standard.
Related:
- Economics in Atlas Shrugged
- Altruism: The Moral Root of the Financial Crisis
- An Interview with Andrew Schiff about Fishing Nets, Hut Gluts, and other Economic Matters
Image: Wikimedia Commons
Well said. I heard this “grow out of objectivism” argument many times from opponents of Ayn Rand’s philosophy. It’s not even an original argument Krugman came up with, which is a good thing for him, because it’s a fallacious one. It doesn’t address the meat of the issue, instead tries to discredit the opponent’s intellect. It’s a classic ad hominem, which in Graham’s Hierarchy of Disagreement is the 2nd worst type of argument in a disagreement. On the upside Mr. Krugman can still do worse. He can still resort to name calling and the public will absolutely love it. :O
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_calling#/media/File:Graham%27s_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement-en.svg