Ted Cruz’s Presidential Campaign Launch: Good and Bad

Senator Ted Cruz—who may prove to be the best (or least-bad) candidate America will see in the 2016 presidential race—just launched his campaign for the presidency in a markedly mixed way.

He launched it at Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University and did so with additional pandering to the so-called “religious right” (which, in fact, is not part of the right). Among his unfortunate claims, Cruz said our rights “come from God Almighty”—which for an educated man in 2015 is ridiculous, and for a reader of Ayn Rand is exceedingly ridiculous. He also lamented that today “roughly half of born again Christians aren’t voting,” and he asked his audience to imagine “millions of people of faith all across America coming out to the polls and voting our values.”

But Cruz didn’t harp for long on such heavily religious themes. Instead, he turned to some important economic and political matters, about which he provided an indication of what he intends to do if he is elected president. Here are some of the positive changes he asked his audience to envision:

Imagine innovation thriving on the Internet as government regulators and tax collectors are kept at bay and more and more opportunity is created. . . .

[I]magine in 2017 a new president signing legislation repealing every word of Obamacare.

Imagine health care reform that keeps government out of the way between you and your doctor and that makes health insurance personal and portable and affordable.

Instead of a tax code that crushes innovation, that imposes burdens on families struggling to make ends met, imagine a simple flat tax that lets every American fill out his or her taxes on a postcard.

Imagine abolishing the IRS. . . .

[I]magine a legal immigration system that welcomes and celebrates those who come to achieve the American dream. . . .

[I]magine a federal government that stands for the First Amendment rights of every American. . . .

Instead of a government that works to undermine our Second Amendment rights, that seeks to ban our ammunition, imagine a federal government that protects the right to keep and bear arms of all law-abiding Americans.

Instead of a government that seizes your emails and your cell phones, imagine a federal government that protected the privacy rights of every American.

Instead of a federal government that seeks to dictate school curriculum through Common Core, imagine repealing every word of Common Core. . . .

Instead of a president who boycotts Prime Minister Netanyahu, imagine a president who stands unapologetically with the nation of Israel.

Instead of a president who seeks to go to the United Nations to end-run Congress and the American people, imagine a president who says I will honor the Constitution and under no circumstances will Iran be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon.

Imagine a president who says we will stand up and defeat radical Islamic terrorism, and we will call it by its name.

That’s pretty refreshing. (Whether Cruz would follow through on this agenda is an open question.)

Of course, being a religious conservative, Cruz also indicated his desire to ban abortion (“to defend the sanctity of human life”) and to outlaw gay marriage (“to uphold the sacrament of marriage”)—but he did so much less directly than he advocated the aforementioned positive elements. He didn’t even say “abortion” or “gay,” so I suspect his goal was to pander to the staunch religionists but to do so lightly. Cruz also mentioned in passing that every American child has a “right to a quality education,” and he said a few other objectionable things. But, by and large, his speech was about as good as we could realistically expect from a politician today.

The most important political issues today—and the most important issues in the 2016 presidential election—are (1) the jihad against America (and the West in general) and what a given candidate promises to do about it; (2) America’s relationship with Israel (which Obama has destroyed) and how the candidate plans to rebuild it; and (3) the rights-violating atrocity known as ObamaCare and what the candidate promises to do about it. On these counts, Cruz looks pretty good so far and may be the best America will see in this election cycle. Time will tell.

For our part, as lovers of liberty and advocates of its moral and philosophical foundations, whichever candidate we end up supporting, we should enthusiastically encourage Cruz’s (and others’) good positions and constructively criticize his (and their) bad ones. That’s how to effect positive change where such change is possible.



Return to Top

Comments submitted to TOS are moderated and checked periodically. Commenters must use their real names, and comments may not exceed 400 words. For a comment to be approved, it must be civil, substantive, and on topic. Ad hominem attacks, arguments from intimidation, misrepresentations, unsubstantiated accusations, baseless assertions, and comments that ignore relevant points made in the article are not permitted. Comments that violate these rules will not be approved. Thank you for helping us to keep the discussion intellectually profitable.

3 Responses to Ted Cruz’s Presidential Campaign Launch: Good and Bad

  1. aeonix1@me.com'
    Friend of John Galt April 13, 2015 at 2:55 pm #

    This is a good analysis the presidential bid announcement made by Ted Cruz. He has obviously pandered to the “religious right” … but an unfortunate reality is that the “religious right” portion of the voting population is an important part of the Republican “base.”

    It is true that in the 2012 election, a large number of evangelicals did not choose to vote for the Republican candidate (even if they voted in other races). Political correctness (apparently) prevented a thorough discussion of Romney’s Mormon background — and from comments I’d seen and heard from various evangelicals (particularly during the primaries), it was a much bigger issue than anyone was willing to admit. If you believe that faith is a source of knowledge, then you can easily be convinced to take on faith the negative feelings you might have about someone with different religious views. (Romney is also to blame because he never clarified how his religious views might affect his governing philosophy — but that was just one of many campaign errors by Romney.)

    As Objectivists, we are unlikely to see (in my lifetime) a candidate who fully embraces Objectivist philosophy — especially so long as there is a major segment of voters who are informed by religious views and are so intolerant that they ignore a candidate who belongs to a “cult” — it is hard to imagine that group would provide any support whatsoever to a candidate who openly declared atheism as their religious viewpoint.

    I agree with the assessment that Cruz might be the “least bad” Republican candidate, especially if even a portion of his stated agenda makes its way into our national government.

  2. msanc2020@gmail.com'
    Peggy1900 April 16, 2015 at 2:11 pm #

    I am interested in Ted Cruz but I will be vigilant about what he says and what he promises to do. We Americans have been burnt enough and after Obama we need major relief from this statist anti-american president.

  3. billsekerak@roadrunner.com'
    Bill Sekerak May 25, 2015 at 1:35 am #

    I am very concerned about any candidate who , if he wins , maybe asking god what he should do if something like a nuclear strike should or should not be launched for whatever reason such a consideration might come about.

Leave a Reply